PsychAuthors

Literaturliste von Dr. Stephan F. Dahm

letzte Aktualisierung: 05.03.2024

Dahm, S. F., Hyna, H. & Krause, D. (2023). Imagine to automatize: Automatization of stimulus-response coupling after action imagery practice in implicit sequence learning. Psychological Research, 87(7), 2259-2274.

Dahm, S. F., Ort, E., Büsel, C., Sachse, P. & Mathot, S. (2023). Implementing multi-session learning studies out of the lab: Tips and tricks using OpenSesame. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 19(2), 156-164.

Dahm, S. F. & Rieger, M. (2023). Kinesthetic vs. visual focus: No evidence for effects of practice modality in representation types after action imagery practice and action execution practice. Human Movement Science, 92, No. 103154.

Dahm, S. F. & Rieger, M. (2023). Time course of learning sequence representations in action imagery practice. Human Movement Science, 87, No. 103050.

Dahm, S. F. & Draxler, C. (2023). Mental paper folding revisited: The involvement of visual action imagery. Psych, 5(1), 14-25.

Dahm, S. F., Weigelt, M. & Rieger, M. (2023). Sequence representations after action-imagery practice of one-finger movements are effector-independent. Psychological Research, 87(1), 210-225.

Muraki, E. J., Dahm, S. F. & Pexman, P. M. (2023). Meaning in hand: Investigating shared mechanisms of motor imagery and sensorimotor simulation in language processing. Cognition, 240, No. 105589.

Rieger, M., Boe, S. G., Ingram, T. G. J., Bart, V. K. E. & Dahm, S. F. (2023). A theoretical perspective on action consequences in action imagery: Internal prediction as an essential mechanism to detect errors. Psychological Research, 1-10.

Dahm, S. F. (2022). Validation of a computer-based version of the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 3(1), 10-22.

Dahm, S. F. & Rieger, M. (2022). A little doubt saves many mistakes: Early and late error detection in copy-typing. Open Psychology, 4(1), 115-131.

Dahm, S. F., Muraki, E. J. & Pexman, P. M. (2022). Hand and foot selection in mental body rotations involves motor-cognitive interactions. Brain Sciences, 12(11), No. 1500.

Dahm, S. F. (2020). On the assessment of motor imagery ability: A research commentary. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(4), 397-408.

Dahm, S. F., Bart, V. K. E., Pithan, J. M. & Rieger, M. (2019). VMIQ-2 - Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire 2 - deutsche Fassung. (PSYNDEX Tests Review).

Dahm, S. F., Bart, V. K. E., Pithan, J. M. & Rieger, M. (2019). Deutsche Übersetzung und Validierung des VMIQ-2 zur Erfassung der Lebhaftigkeit von Handlungsvorstellungen. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 26(4), 151-158.

Dahm, S. F. & Rieger, M. (2019). Errors in imagined and executed typing. Vision, 3(4), No. 66.

Dahm, S. F. & Rieger, M. (2019). Is imagery better than reality? Performance in imagined dart throwing. Human Movement Science, 66, 38-52.

Rieger, M., Dahm, S. F. & Koch, I. (2017). Inhibition in motor imagery: A novel action mode switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 459-466.

Dahm, S. F. & Rieger, M. (2016). Cognitive constraints on motor imagery. Psychological Research, 80(2), 235-247.

Dahm, S. F. & Rieger, M. (2016). Is there symmetry in motor imagery? Exploring different versions of the mental chronometry paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(6), 1794-1805.

Pithan, J. M. & Dahm, S. F. (2015). Fragebögen und Testmethoden der Bewegungsvorstellung. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 22(3), 112-124.

---

weiterführende Informationen

• Seite weiterempfehlen
• Seite drucken

nach oben